What is the problem of Russell’s proposal?

Tutor's Answer

(Top Tutor) Studyfaq Tutor
But, with the allowance of singular terms also referring to non-existent objects, as long as there is some object referred to by an ordinary proper name as well as a definite description, there are no big problems as to assume that sentences containing them can be meaningful. Even the object we are talking about does not exist. At the same time, by allowing this, Russell proposes that we automatically drop ST2 and stop applying it. BUT, this solution of the law of existential statements is not very satisfactory. If we get...
Completed Work